Difference between revisions of "Closing Protection Letters"
From WFG Wiki
Davidjenkins (talk | contribs) (Created page with " {{| class="wikitable" |style="width: 100%;" | colspan="4" | |- | style="width: 25%;"| Alabama | style="width: 25%;"| Closing Pro...") |
Davidjenkins (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | WFG does not issue CPLs to lenders or any other party for the acts of a non-agent with two exceptions: | ||
| + | # '''Illinois''' - There is a quasi-insurance type escrow company called an “independent escrowee”. Under the statute, the IE has to meet the same financial requirements as a title insurance underwriter ($1,000,000 in liquid assets/reserves) and they are not required to issue CPLs like an underwriter does for their agents. There’s only 1 IE in Illinois and it’s owned by a WFG agent. WFG issues CPLs for the IE pursuant to a vendor’s services agreement that allows WFG to audit the IE’s accounts, etc. | ||
| + | # '''Approved Attorneys''' in states where that’s custom/practice pursuant to a vendor’s services agreement. | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | WFG could arguably issue a CPL pursuant to a vendor’s services agreement, but there’s not a lot of upside for WFG to do so. | |
| − | + | ||
| + | In addition to the above, there may be regulatory issues in some states that would prevent WFG from issuing a CPL on behalf of a non-agent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in Alabama | Alabama]] | | style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in Alabama | Alabama]] | ||
| Line 67: | Line 73: | ||
| style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in Missouri | Missouri]] | | style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in Missouri | Missouri]] | ||
| style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania]] | | style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania]] | ||
| − | | style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in | + | | style="width: 25%;"| [[Closing Protection Letters in US Territories | US Territories]] |
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:59, 24 January 2020
WFG does not issue CPLs to lenders or any other party for the acts of a non-agent with two exceptions:
- Illinois - There is a quasi-insurance type escrow company called an “independent escrowee”. Under the statute, the IE has to meet the same financial requirements as a title insurance underwriter ($1,000,000 in liquid assets/reserves) and they are not required to issue CPLs like an underwriter does for their agents. There’s only 1 IE in Illinois and it’s owned by a WFG agent. WFG issues CPLs for the IE pursuant to a vendor’s services agreement that allows WFG to audit the IE’s accounts, etc.
- Approved Attorneys in states where that’s custom/practice pursuant to a vendor’s services agreement.
WFG could arguably issue a CPL pursuant to a vendor’s services agreement, but there’s not a lot of upside for WFG to do so.
In addition to the above, there may be regulatory issues in some states that would prevent WFG from issuing a CPL on behalf of a non-agent.
